SHARE
flag
the grid

Coconut Wireless


Wondering If We Should Care About Mele Carroll And Her Campaign Finance Deadline Issues While Mazie Hirono Erases Ed Case With A Single TV Ad


mele_carroll

August 01, 2012 | 07:22 AM
MELE CARROLL STILL CAN'T MEET A CAMPAIGN FINANCE REPORT DEADLINE

You know what's depressing? Reading the newspaper. And I know, because I write for a newspaper.

I'm serious. In the last week, it seems that every time I open a paper or check my Google News Reader, I read some downer of a story that forces me to ask why we even bother to have laws and constitutions and things.

Case in point is state Representative Mele Carroll (D-East Maui, Lanai, Molokai, Kaho'olawe) and her seemingly complete inability to file a campaign finance report on time. She was busted for five violations last time around, and it cost her $2,608 in fines from the state Campaign Spending Commission (though complex, these reports are not impossible–the rest of Maui's delegation in the state House of Representatives apparently managed to get their reports in by the deadline and, well, you get the idea).

shadow
shadow
shadow
Anyway, if you thought that would teach her to put campaign reports on the very top of her To Do list, you'd be wrong. On Thursday, July 26, The Maui News ran a story saying Carroll had, yet again, missed the filing deadline. But a mere 24 hours later–surprise! The News has a follow-up article saying Carroll had finally gotten her paperwork completed (and just two weeks late!). Why it took so long for the representative to file her re-election committee's campaign finance report is difficult to say–Carroll's explanation in the paper was a jumble of words like "misplaced" and "forgot" and "a friend in Honolulu had my file in her bag."

Look, Carroll isn't a bad person. She isn't even a bad legislator. But clearly, more than $2,000 in fines slapped against her last year didn't convince Carroll that getting a proper accounting of the money her campaign committee is taking in and dishing out to the commission so they can disseminate it to the public was all that important.

Me? I want nearly everything done by public officials disclosed to the public. This is about as realistic as getting state officials to make clear that zoning designations like "residential" and "light industrial" mean exactly what they say, and prohibit land developers from, say, loading tens of thousands of square feet of commercial retail businesses into land zoned "light industrial." Or requiring the Obama Administration to explain exactly how the National Security Agency allegedly conducted "unconstitutional" spying on Americans.

We can all dream, right?

*****

DOES ED CASE HAVE ANY ISSUES LEFT?

If I were Ed Case, I'd start to consider ending my electoral political aspirations. He's a decent guy, sure, and, when he was in the U.S. House of Representatives, as effective as a legislator can be when he or she is from Hawaii. But from the start of his campaign for the U.S. Senate seat currently held by retiring Democrat Daniel Akaka, Case has pretty much been the odd guy out at a dance between current Democratic Representative Mazie Hirono (whose 2nd District includes all of Hawaii except Honolulu) and Republican Linda Lingle. Profoundly unpopular with the Hawaii Democratic Party since his upstart attempt to unseat Akaka six years ago, Case was a third choice for the seat the instant he entered the race.

From the beginning, the senate race shaped itself as a rematch between liberal Congresswoman Hirono, the one-time Hawaii lieutenant governor who in 2002 had wanted the state's top job, and Lingle the conservative woman from Missouri who beat her and then sat in the governor's office for eight straight years. And that was all long before Hirono started running that "Opposites Attract" television ad.

Seriously, have you seen that thing? It's just a minute and a half long, but it eviscerates Case's premier argument against Hirono–that she's too liberal to represent Hawaii in the Senate. It's been his best drum to beat, and beat it he has (Hirono is, after all, extremely liberal), but right before his last televised debate with Hirono, her new ad hit the airwaves and smashed Case's drum to bits.

The ad is very simple. It shows Hirono, clad in a purple jacket, sitting next to 19-term Republican Congressman Don Young of Alaska. Young, who has sat in Congress since Richard Nixon was president, is the second most senior Republican in the U.S. House. Did I mention he's also a Republican? Anyway, in the ad Young–A REPUBLICAN–sits next to Democrat Hirono and chats about how they struck some bipartisan compromise on some bill that apparently required Hirono "to battle my party leadership to get our amendment passed." This thing apparently meant so much to Young that he (who, I might have forgotten to say, is a member of the Republican Party) is now endorsing Hirono for the United States Senate.

The content, the timing, the simple, folksy style of the ad–it's all genius. A week ago, no one outside of Alaska had even heard of Don Young (or Mazie Hirono, for that matter), and now CNN is blogging about them both.

The ad is also great political theater: Young gets in a few (smiling) jabs at House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, and Hirono (also smiling) attempts to keep Young from saying too much. We're so used to hearing Democratic and Republican politicians hurling ludicrous charges at each other, that the sight of two on opposite sides of the room sitting next to each other, joking and being friendly is genuinely shocking.

Ultimately, of course, I'm not Ed Case, and he wouldn't be much of a politician if he bowed out of the race at the urging of a lowly alt-weekly editor. But it's also undeniable that Hirono's Young endorsement couldn't come at a worse time for Case.

*****

ON THE LIGHTER SIDE...

Just out of curiosity, given all the talk during this political campaign about the economy and such, I checked a few numbers this week. According to the Statewide Homeless Point-in-Time Count for 2011 (the most recent report put out by the Hawaii Department of Human Services), there are 658 unsheltered homeless people living in Maui County. At the same time, RealtyTrac–a website that tracks foreclosures nationwide–reports that there are currently 718 homes in Maui County on the foreclosure list.

See? The system works.

print
Print
email
Email Link
Comment
Feedback
share
Share
  1. print email
    Pignataro Article "Best County Blunder"
    August 03, 2012 | 11:16 AM

    Best Bone-headed Non-Journalism Award

    Drumroll please… and the Best Boneheaded Non-Journalism Award 2012 goes to… Anthony Pignataro… for his totally inaccurate portrayal of the Wailuku Main Street Association (WMSA) in the July 19 Maui Times. Instead of “doing his homework” as a journalist to investigate the actual facts, the writer bases his story on similarly erroneous and misleading Maui News articles we have already responded to with the facts at www.mauitowns.org.

    He is not disputing these facts, but rather repeats the allegations of a few disgruntled former Board members, who missed most of the meetings and refused to attend Program Orientation (to learn about the specialized 26-year old, national and local award winning grassroots program they were involved with).

    Sometimes volunteer non-profit board members can be troublesome when they are on the Board for there own self-serving agenda rather than to further the mission of the organization. Our mission is “Economic revitalization, with the context of historic and cultural preservation.”, something very important to keeping Maui unique.

    The writer insinuates that WMSA has used an unsubstantiated sensational amount of County money for nothing, and the whole thing smells. What smells is Pignataro’s lack of professionalism, journalistic integrity, and the poor editorial oversight that allowed this false reporting to occur. He doesn’t bother to mention that WMSA is audited annually by an independent Certified Public Accountant, a process which essentially verifies to the penny, that WMSA has received and used it’s funding appropriately to carry out it’s mission and contractual obligations. Instead, the reporter has fabricated his “facts” from rumors and innuendo without ever once contacting us about this concern. Our work (for services rendered and completed projects for ten-plus towns) has been approved and signed-off by Maui County for the last twenty six years.

    The article alludes to a disingenuous statement by Planning Director Spence quoted in the Maui News that he didn’t know what WMSA does, when in fact, WMSA assisted Spence when he was a consultant supporting the expansion of our local Hanzawa Store. We backed him up, now, he forgets what we do. Everyone Pignataro sights as a reference can be easily shown to have an obvious conflict of interest, including a desire to please the Planning Department. Their mission was not the WMSA Board’s mission. They were out-voted, then acted contrary to decisions of the Board. This is all in our minutes and easy to verify. The investigative reporter could have learned a little about what WMSA does by reading Maui County Council Resolution 06-53, which congratulates WMSA on 20 years of community service and lists some of our noteworthy achievements.

    What the writer may or may not realize is that he is aiding in a concerted effort by Spence’s department to control the revelation, documentation, and consideration of local concerns related to the soon-to-be-finished Maui Island and General Plan(s). WMSA has long been an advocate for local concerns and protecting the authentic character of our small towns. Other community groups have also felt this effort to control. Ask around.

    The article abuses our Executive Director (ED), who at no time denied any Board member anything but rather referred their request to the appropriate Board officer to ensure a proper procedure and process. The ED does the Board’s bidding. Over the years, she has received numerous excellent evaluations, Board votes of confidence for her professionalism, and numerous letters of appreciation from community members (see attached unanimous Board Resolution and Settlement from our 15-member Board). The article also trashes me, as WMSA Chair. In my own defense I would humbly offer that I have freely given almost 30 years of volunteer service and have always worked toward the group mission. As a keiki o ka ‘aina Maui I have limited my volunteering to non-profits that work to keep Maui Maui, and where my training might do the most good.

    Most recently, I Chaired the Maui General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) with 25-members, from all parts of Maui, all walks of local life, that was tasked with providing a grassroots version of the General and Maui Island Plan. The ordinance that created GPAC said there were to be 3 versions sent on to the Council for review: GPAC’s, the Planning Commission’s, and the Planning Department’s version, however, the Planning Department sent on only their version without noting many hard-won hard-deliberated GPAC concerns, approved recommendations that were removed and otherwise minimized, including the imperative need to set aside modern non-automobile transit corridors for fuel-efficient trains between our distant communities while we can negotiate and pay not urban land acquisition costs. If we are not planning for the local community’s benefit, who are we planning for?

    WMSA has been instrumental in keeping Maui’s small town’s real and respectful of the history of each, and in this way has supported Maui’s visitor industry by protecting the authentic unique qualities visitors come here to see and experience. If these real qualities are lost, the visitor might as well go to Disneyland, it’s closer, or Fiji, for the real thing. From prior writing, on other subjects, it would seem this reporter might support this goal..., but this is not the case, and therefore the Best Boneheaded Non-Journalism Award 2012 goes to… Anthony Pignataro… for his totally inaccurate portrayal of the Wailuku Main Street Association (WMSA) in the July 19 Maui Times. May the truth set us free from those who would control Maui’s future and lessen the voice of longtime residents. Visit www.mauitowns.org.


    T. Cannon
    Haiku
  2. print email
    August 03, 2012 | 06:05 PM

    Don Young clarified that his endorsement is limited to the primary election. This should come as no surprise. I'm pretty sure every single republican in the country is "endorsing" Mazie in this primary because poll after poll has shown that Ed does much better than Mazie in a head to head against Lingle. In any case (pun intended), luckly this election is near an end, since Mr. Pignataro has apparently been unable to write about anything other than how Ed Case is a non-entity in the race. Unfortunately, his near obsession with doing so suggests exactly the opposite.

    Caleb Rowe
    Wailuku
Reader Feedback Submission
Use this form to submit Reader Feedback.
* required value
Your Name*

Town

Email (not shown on website)

Subject

Comment*

Verification*


Calendar Search
Event
calendar icon
Zip Code Proximity
of
Entertainment and lifestyle news for Maui, Hawaii and the surrounding Islands. Maui Time Weekly is Mauis only independent and locally owned newspaper. Mail this link to a friend
Web Analytics