SHARE
flag
the grid

Upfront News


Does Maui Need a Ban on Texting While Driving?


No County law is imminent, but a federal bill could do the job


October 08, 2009
First a confession: I've done it. Odds are you've done it too, as have most of your friends. And, though experts agree it's unsafe and even potentially deadly, it's completely legal in Maui County

Texting while driving is a practice that's grown along with the profusion of cell phones. Various studies have come to various conclusions about exactly how dangerous it is to type a text message while behind the wheel (or to talk on a cell phone in general). But nobody argues it's safe, and many say it's as bad as driving drunk.

Earlier this year, the Honolulu City Council passed a bill banning the use of all mobile electronic devices while driving, with exemptions given to emergency workers, drivers whose jobs require the use of two-way radios and people using hands-free devices or calling 911. The law slaps drivers with a $67 fine for the first offense. A similar ban on the Big Island is set to take effect January 1.

What about Maui? Lt. Wallace Tom of the Maui Police Department said that, while his department discourages the practice, with no law to enforce there's little they can do. Asked if a county law is in the works, Councilmember Gladys Baisa said nothing is imminent, but the issue has been discussed.

Baisa said the council is monitoring the situation on Oahu, and may use it as a litmus test to see if a ban could work here, and if so how best to craft one. "Nothing is as simple as it appears," she said, adding that she would have to study the issue further to form an opinion pro or con. Baisa said that, obviously, if a state or federal prohibition were put into effect, the county would have to honor it.

Though various bills introduced at the state level have fizzled, a federal effort spearheaded by New York Sen. Chuck Schumer has made its way to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. If passed, the Avoiding Life-Endangering and Reckless Texting By Drivers Act of 2009 would give states a choice: ban texting while driving or lose 25 percent of federal highway funds. It's a heavy-handed approach that will raise the hackles of state's rights advocates, but it's pretty clear it would get results.

The question is whether these laws, once passed, are effective. The answer seems to be that it's too early to tell, but intuitively it makes sense that if people know something's illegal, they're at least slightly less likely to do it.

In a perfect world, this stuff wouldn't be necessary. People would police themselves and make the smartest, safest possible choices. That we don't, in fact, live in a perfect world is not news to anyone.

AAA spokesman Robert Sinclair, quoted in an October 4 newsday.com report, may have put it best: "It's upsetting that people are so dumb we have to make a law in the first place." Maui Time Weekly, Jacob Shafer

print
Print
email
Email Link
Comment
Feedback
share
Share
  1. print email
    Freedom and Responsibility
    October 08, 2009 | 03:24 PM

    This is just another example of government restricting the freedoms of it's people, under the guise of protection. While I actively discourage this activity in my company, and don't do it myself, I believe that it is the responsibility of the individual to decide the safest course of action. If the person acts in an unsafe manner, and something happens, then they need to pay the consequence. The less the individual wants to take responsibility for his actions, the more that individual will turn over his freedoms to the government. We all have the choice to be akamai, but the majority choose not to be, and hence people act stupidly.

    T. D., Makawao
  2. print email
    October 08, 2009 | 06:20 PM

    I bet T.D. doesn't wear a helmet when riding his/her bike.

    TipAndRing
  3. print email
    The problem...
    October 08, 2009 | 08:54 PM

    ...TD is that when you get behind the wheel of a vehicle, you're not just taking responsibility for your own safety but the safety of others. I'm all for freedom and rights, but what about MY right to not share the road with some idiot driving with one hand while he stares at his Blackberry and texts with the other.

    By your logic we should have no laws against drunk driving either. Hey, why even bother giving people driving tests and setting a minimum driving age? Just let everyone with access to a vehicle drive and let the chips fall where they may.

    Personal responsibility has its limits.

    Safe Driver
  4. print email
    Also...
    October 08, 2009 | 08:57 PM

    "If the person acts in an unsafe manner, and something happens, then they need to pay the consequence."

    This doesn't help me much if I'm dead from a head-on collision with some texting fool.

    Safe (And Scared) Driver
  5. print email
    In agreement with T.D
    October 09, 2009 | 10:12 PM

    I also agree with T.D. How much control do you want your gov't to have over your lives? Personal responsibility has its limits, but so does personal freedom. How much of your freedom do you want to give up before you wake up and realize it's gone entirely? Do you live your life in fear, or seize each day as though it may be your last?

    Realistically, a passenger in a car can be just as great of a distraction as a cell phone. Heck, getting out of bed each morning is a risk. Should we make a law regarding that as well? The point is, we don't live in little plastic bubbles and it's incredibly naive to think that a law is going to protect you... As a matter-of-fact, there even comes a point when a law is a hindrance to actually taking responsibility for one's actions.

    Really, it's about education more than anything. I wear my helmet when riding my bike, not because I HAVE to, but because I'm not stupid. I've also been hit while riding my bicycle, not because the driver was texting, or even talking on their cellphone, but because they decided to make a last minute right turn in front of me after just passing by me on the road. Those who don't wear helmets? Well, better to weed them out of the gene pool earlier, rather than later.

    I'd rather keep my freedom and make responsible decisions for myself and my family... not let the gov't do it for me, thank you very much...

    t~
  6. print email
    Religion and Family control you life more than Government
    October 10, 2009 | 08:33 PM

    The "Government Restricting Our Freedoms Argument" is usually valid. In the case of 'texting while driving' it is not. Texting while driving is far more dangerous than driving drunk hands down. I've done it and many times have nearly driven off the road or crossed the center divider. Many people have stated how disturbing it is that we need a law to prevent something so moronic from happening and I agree.

    For the government restriction crowd, I get it. You need this debate to continue to prove how government is getting too involved in our lives. Your simple goal is to make the Liberals look like Socialist Dictators, we get it already. I say Religion and Family are too involved in our lives.

    Keep the government out of my life and let me murder my wife like they do in Saudi Arabia. Let me burn your house down to keep warm, let me eat your dog to feed my son and let me steal your car to get to work.

    Professional Smart-Ass
  7. print email
    Unless...
    October 11, 2009 | 02:59 PM

    ...you're a full-on anarchist, you agree there should be some amount of gov't regulation to keep people safe.

    The only debate is where the line should be drawn. To me , a texting or cell phone ban doesn't make sense because what about all the other distractions in the car? Should we ban people eating in the car, or listening to the radio above a certain volume?

    BUT--those who are saying it's "big brother" for the gov't to pass ANY laws protecting us from each other are, IMO, libertarian fools, just as naive as the far left liberals who think gov't is the solution to everything. In many cases, individuals should take responsibility for their own actions. But the reason it's preferable to live in a society of laws is that we're protected from the worst of human nature (in theory).

    Middle Ground(ed)
  8. print email
    Hello???
    October 13, 2009 | 06:30 PM

    Im all for the freedom thing too...but when you put other people's life in jeoprardy because you have to text your bff to meet you at the mall to cruise guys I have a personal problem with that. Do you have the right to kill me or my family because you can not pre plan your day/evening. Why are we so connected to one another? Why is it we cannot wait two seconds to talk to each other? I really dont get it.. BE SMART

    Mikala
Reader Feedback Submission
Use this form to submit Reader Feedback.
* required value
Your Name*

Town

Email (not shown on website)

Subject

Comment*

Verification*


Calendar Search
Event
calendar icon
Zip Code Proximity
of
Entertainment and lifestyle news for Maui, Hawaii and the surrounding Islands. Maui Time Weekly is Mauis only independent and locally owned newspaper. Mail this link to a friend
Web Analytics