Lumps of coal for the three unwise men who whistled at my 16-year-old daughter outside Star Market in Kihei. Good thing for you it was me she was with and not her dad, or you wouldn't have faces left to whistle with. Next time you see an underage girl—or any girl for that matter—keep your perversions to yourself.
So what I am hearing is that an adult woman thinks it is a "perversion" for a man to be sexually attracted to a 16 year old girl.
What planet is this woman living on? If it disturbs her that men want to mate with nubile girls, I would invite her to reflect on the phrase "it is better to slipper your own feet, than to carpet the entire world." In other words, grow up, sort out your own neuroses, and stop dumping your problems on men.
Ohhh lady, dat was yor dauda??? She no look lik one 16 yr old, I tink she look mo lik 20!!! y she dress wit da tight shirt and small kine shorts? An y she smile at me li dat?
Biggie
December 24, 2009 | 11:54 PM
That Eh Brah didn't make sense. So he's the father of the 16 year old, yet he mentions that the guys got off lucky because her dad wasn't around, which would mean the guy is either her boyfriend or......
Am I not reading that right, or is this some sort of perverse sexual fetish I don't know about?
Anonymous
December 25, 2009 | 01:53 PM
Eh maybe as the same bugga's that was drunk down on the beach, to dem everything is right! What those bugga's need is one punch an one lump of coal across their fat noses! Bottom line, no ack stupid!
This narration is so spare, so incomplete, that the reader finds oneself required to fill in a lot of missing information with one's own prejudices, feelings, and projections. Depending on the energy and intent behind the communications from the 3 men, their "noises" could be interpreted as either 'disgusting', or as compliments...the final judgment in this, too, depends mostly on the perspective and response of the woman toward whom the communications were directed. It is also worth considering the respondent above who generally is saying, "Don't dress up like a sex-object if sex is not your object." And, if the guys were genuinely obnoxious and out-of-line, they were merely setting themselves up for some more feedback from the universe in regard to being more civil.
I think you hit the nail on the head. Not only the reader is left to project, but the whole story to begin with was a projection (by the MOTHER OF THE GIRL, okaaaaaay??).
Ma'm-- It is clothes that are the problem, and lead men into this "perversion." It is a known scientific fact that, on her 18th birthday, a wahine's puunani changes color and swells up, until it looks like a big red catcher's mitt, thus signalling to any kane nearby that she is sexually mature and receptive. Since everyone wears clothes now, kane are not able to see this signal. Therefore, we mistake "spoof" signals, such as swelling breasts, shapely hips, and long legs, as evidence that a juvenile female is ready to reproduce.
For all males in the world, I apologize for the inconvenience of the persistent problem of un-called for erections, all over the planet.
In the spirit of Christmas, I am giving you 24 hours before calling the FBI. Why? Well, gee, lemme see. You print a complaint by a woman that men are wolf-whistling at her underage daughter, calling it "perverted". You accompany the story with a picture--a drawing, yes, but a GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION--of a large-breasted, bare-midriffed, UNDERAGE GIRL. Now, tell me, how is this NOT child pornography?
God may not strike you down, but the FBI most certainly will. For you are purveyors of the worst kind of hypocritical child pornography yet seen on Maui.
P.S. Oh, I have not forgotten about that witch-hunt you led for me, the chaplain at Calvary Chapel and bible college. I have just been waiting for my chance to smite thee, sodomites! It is time for me to lay my wrath upon thee!
They could have been whistling at you, but perhaps your conclusion that your daughter was the target reveals your own acknowledgment that sher dresses provocatively enough to provoke such cat-calls. As the parent you should be aware of the fact that she already understands how project herself sexually. If you are interested in protecting her innocence or morality, I suggest that threats of exposing her to physical violence will be counter to your goal.
Steve
December 26, 2009 | 10:33 PM
"Now, tell me, how is this NOT child pornography? '
Uh, the lack of visible tits and ass?
Seriously, if a clothed underage girl is considered to be child pornography, then why aren't you going after the Mattel Corporation for controlling the Bratz Line, Marvel Comics for Runaways, oh, and let's not forget the hundreds of movies that Hollywood cranks out dealing with High-School hijinks and sex. American Pie, (insert word here) Movie, and Jennifer's Body should be your first targets there. Hell, I hear James Cameron made Avatar because he wants to skirt Child Pornography Laws by using CGI as the legal remedy.
I admit to not liking Maui Time, but I do at least defend their right to print what they please within the acceptable bounds of the law. You Sir have the right to disagree with them (As do I), but never the right to file frivolous reports that waste Law Enforcement time and money.
You are a douche FBI wont do anything that is not child porn you are another mis-lead christian with no bearing or wrath! So called man of god whatever loser. You need to actually read the bible instead of trying to preach it.
Entertainment and lifestyle news for Maui, Hawaii and the surrounding Islands. Maui Time Weekly is Mauis only independent and locally owned newspaper.
Mail this link to a friend
