December 26, 2009 | 10:33 PM

"Now, tell me, how is this NOT child pornography? '

Uh, the lack of visible tits and ass?

Seriously, if a clothed underage girl is considered to be child pornography, then why aren't you going after the Mattel Corporation for controlling the Bratz Line, Marvel Comics for Runaways, oh, and let's not forget the hundreds of movies that Hollywood cranks out dealing with High-School hijinks and sex. American Pie, (insert word here) Movie, and Jennifer's Body should be your first targets there. Hell, I hear James Cameron made Avatar because he wants to skirt Child Pornography Laws by using CGI as the legal remedy.

I admit to not liking Maui Time, but I do at least defend their right to print what they please within the acceptable bounds of the law. You Sir have the right to disagree with them (As do I), but never the right to file frivolous reports that waste Law Enforcement time and money.

The Unlikely Defender